baseline_reproduction_run
no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Last revision | |||
— | baseline_reproduction_run [2020/03/01 07:54] – created matsz | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | =====Baseline reproduction run===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Not formally a component of the baseline calibration procedure, it has become an established habit to validate the calibration of supply using the simulation models themselves. There are many conceivable circumstances where the build-in calibration tests would pass, but a normal simulation nevertheless would not replicate the calibration point, for instance if some necessary and calibrated data is not properly loaded. | ||
+ | Furthermore, | ||
+ | |||
+ | In order to facilitate the evaluation of the calibration point, we run the same scenario as the one used to calibrate the model, but under a different name. “cal” and “ref” are frequently used name suffixes. Since the calibration is done country-wise, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Figure 12: CAPRI settings: read in all the country specific gdx files from the results directory (capmod); load a specified symbol (dataout); store the data back into a gdx file with the same name but without country suffix** | ||
+ | {{:: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then, the GUI can be used in a standard fashion to manually compare the activity levels reported after calibration with those computed in a baseline reproduction run. | ||
baseline_reproduction_run.txt · Last modified: 2022/11/07 10:23 by 127.0.0.1